Tuesday, July 3, 2012

An Open Letter to the American Reader

www.michaeladelberg.com

Hey You, American Reader. Psst… Lean forward... I have a secret to tell you. This is the golden age of the American book.
Stop laughing. I’m serious.

Yes, I am very familiar with the pessimistic critiques. Andrew Delbanco’s “The Decline and Fall of American Literature” in the New York Review of Books a decade ago popularized the hand-wringing. More recently, the Wall Street Journal revived the discussion with a provocative op-ed titled “What Killed American Lit?” No less a literary luminary than Gore Vidal has offered: “The future is dark for literature. Certainly the young in general are not going to take up reading when they have such easy alternatives as television, movies, and rock.” Indeed, we all grumble about lacking time to curl up with a good book; book reading is out of sync with modernity’s need for compartmentalized activities like Net surfing.
Nonetheless, a dispassionate look at the American reader suggests a healthier picture. First, contrary to widely held assumptions, Americans are reading more than in the past. Gallup reports that 47% of Americans are reading a book, up from 37% in 1990 and 23% in 1957. To meet this market, an estimated 320,000 books were published in the U.S. last year (60,000 were novels). The gross quantity of literary content has never been higher, and we have record numbers of writers with advanced degrees and training; the law of probability tells us that there must be excellent books out there.    

The problem then, my dear American reader, is not that you lack excellent books. The problem is that you lack the time to enjoy them, and you lack the ability to sift through the junk and find the best work. Fortunately, there are emerging solutions to both problems.
Shorter Books for Busier People: Book length has grown and shrunk over the centuries; there is no ideal length for a novel. In the 1800s and early 1900s, when authors catered to a small, but dominant leisure class, novels ballooned in size to 200,000 words. Victorian authors like Dickens were serialized in magazines and paid by the word. We came to accept a correlation between excellence and length. But this is nonsense: It is harder to write a 50,000 word novel than an 80,000 word novel. My own experience proves this. Two of my three books were three hundred flabby pages in early drafts. Knowing my reader would benefit from a shorter and cheaper book, I hacked away and reimagined the manuscripts—dropping entire chapters and tightening plot lines for a cleaner read. My latest book, The Razing of Tinton Falls (about the destruction of a village during the American Revolution, as witnessed by diverse, opposing narrators) weighs in at a trim 160 pages. The two best books I’ve read in the last year, Marc Schuster’s The Grievers and Michel Stone’s The Iguana Tree, are 360 pages between them.  

Easy Access to the Best Content: There is amazing writing out there, but it can be hard to find. The Internet is a good thing, but it hides great content within a forest of mediocrity. Past arbiters of good taste (i.e., The New Yorker, The New York Review of Books) don’t even try to keep up with the small and alternative presses that are publishing the most interesting books. Fortunately, the Internet provides useful filters for the resourceful reader. Excellent content filters include: RealClear.com for journalism, ReadIt.com for blogs, and book reviewers like Kirkus, Publisher’s Weekly, and The New York Journal of Books (disclosure: I review fiction for the NYJB). Unlike book reviews on Amazon or Good Reads, where the reviewers are often biased and untrained, these professional sites provide measured reviews from well-trained/credentialed reviewers and they cover much more than traditional magazines.
So, American Reader, do not despair. Authors are adapting to your needs with shorter, tighter books, and reliable filters are emerging to guide you to the best writing. Don’t be discouraged, enjoy this Golden Age.

No comments:

Post a Comment