This November, Skyfall,
the 23rd James Bond movie in forty years, will debut in half-filled
theatres across the country. In some circles, the release of a new Bond film is
still meaningful; I bet the Flat-Earth Society is ecstatic.
When Dr. No, the
first Bond movie, was released in 1962, it was a sensation. The Bond franchise
hit its stride two years later with the third Bond film, the imaginative and
stylish Goldfinger. Bond movies were
churned out reliably every second year after that. As a boy growing up in the
1970s, I remember the re-run of a Bond movie on television as a bond-ing
experience for my family. It trumped normal family activities, and we’d watch it
together in the family room.
James Bond was different from other movie heroes. American heroes
came out of the “noble savage” literary tradition: The gunfighter of the American
Western (think John Wayne, Gary Cooper) and the gumshoe detective of the
Gangster movies (think James Cagney, Humphrey Bogart) were plain-spoken,
rough-edged, and working class.
Bond was everything that American movie heroes were not: He
was sophisticated to the point of snobby (note his put down of the Beatles in Goldfinger), formal in his dress, subtle
in his wordplay, and practiced in the exotic—from martial arts to Baccarat. Bond-movie
gadgets and pyrotechnics advanced the state of the art for action films. While
American movie heroes saved a family or a town from a gang of bad guys, James
Bond saved the entire world from international syndicates of superstar evildoers.
He didn’t just get “the girl” at the end of the movie, he got girls all through
the movie. To a generation of filmgoers, men wanted to be James Bond and women
wanted to be with James Bond.
If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, then we know
how influential Bond has been. 007 inspired hit television shows like The Man from the UNCLE, The Saint, and the Bond satire, Get Smart. Bond undergirded episodes of The Flintstones and the Beatles movie Help. Even a generation later, the Bond
influence is seen in cartoons like Inspector
Gadget and the Austin Powers
movies.
But it isn’t 1964, or even 1994, anymore. Movie franchises
like Star Wars, Indiana Jones, The Matrix,
The Terminator, and Transformers have long since surpassed Bond-movie
action sequences and cinematography. Simplistic heroes like Rambo have more testosterone
than Bond; Harry Potter has better gadgets.
And Bond’s endless string of woman conquests and non-Anglo
villains may strike a new generation of moviegoers as sexist, ethnocentric, and
a little creepy. The most recent Bond
films have attempted to update the franchise a bit—i.e., introducing a woman
(Judy Dench) as Bond’s boss, Christopher Walken as a relatively recent villain.
But even with a few concessions to modernity, the Bond movie remains largely formulaic
and outdated to a new generation of moviegoers.
James Bond is the 2nd largest grossing movie franchise
of all time. Bond was the cat’s pajamas way back when. But even with a
blonde-haired, beer-drinking, edgier James Bond (Daniel Craig), 007 belongs in
the Old Spies home. Skyfall will get
generate respectable gate receipts in the U.S. because there are still aging Baby
Boomers buying movie tickets. But the Boomers are aging, 007’s days are
numbered.
“Oh, James…” coo the Bond girls as they are swept away by
his charm and mo-jo at the end of the film. But they never finish the thought.
So I will. “Oh, James… you’re so 20th Century.”
No comments:
Post a Comment